Booo false advertising!!
Jan. 6th, 2012 12:10 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I know I'm WAY late to the party on this one. But a few weeks ago my sister showed me an E3 trailer for a video game called 'Dead Island'. The trailer is AMAZING! And I got really excited for the game. I swear, this thing was so well done that I almost cried at the end. That's right. A video game trailer about zombies invading a beach resort almost made me cry. I'd go on, but you have to see this thing for yourself if you haven't already:
===
What would you guess is the plot of the game based solely on that trailer? I assumed that it must be about the mother of that poor little girl fighting to survive and avenge the deaths of her husband and child (since the trailer doesn't show the mother getting killed or bitten by a zombie). After all, why else would those characters be front and center in the game's trailer?
Well, turns out that the family in the trailer has NOTHING to do with the actual game. Based on the reviews I've seen, the actual game is nothing more than a generic "bland dude runs down hallways mowing down zombies with shit he finds laying around" game. The player can find the mom and dad's dead bodies in a hotel room if he looks for it (but not the little girl. Because dead children would get the game banned in most of Europe), but that's it.
Am I the only one who thinks that studio wasted a MAJOR opportunity with this game? A LOT of people were emotionally moved by this trailer and the game apparently got a ton of E3 buzz because of it. People felt for the family in the trailer and wanted to know more about them. So having the mother be the protagonist would have made a lot of people excited to buy it even if the gameplay wasn't that good (I know I would have!).
However, the fact that the family is just a hidden Easter Egg in the actual game makes the trailer feel....exploitative. Like it was just using the imagery of a cute little girl getting chomped on by zombies in front of her helpless parents because they knew it would tug on heartstrings and create buzz. But they didn't have the balls to go outside the box and make the game any different from the dozens of monster/zombie/whatever shooters starring generic white male protagonists.
Anyhoo, the moral of this rambling write up is: Don't trust video game trailers! ESPECIALLY if it has no footage of the actual game.
Also, the people responsible for the trailer should be running the company.
===
What would you guess is the plot of the game based solely on that trailer? I assumed that it must be about the mother of that poor little girl fighting to survive and avenge the deaths of her husband and child (since the trailer doesn't show the mother getting killed or bitten by a zombie). After all, why else would those characters be front and center in the game's trailer?
Well, turns out that the family in the trailer has NOTHING to do with the actual game. Based on the reviews I've seen, the actual game is nothing more than a generic "bland dude runs down hallways mowing down zombies with shit he finds laying around" game. The player can find the mom and dad's dead bodies in a hotel room if he looks for it (but not the little girl. Because dead children would get the game banned in most of Europe), but that's it.
Am I the only one who thinks that studio wasted a MAJOR opportunity with this game? A LOT of people were emotionally moved by this trailer and the game apparently got a ton of E3 buzz because of it. People felt for the family in the trailer and wanted to know more about them. So having the mother be the protagonist would have made a lot of people excited to buy it even if the gameplay wasn't that good (I know I would have!).
However, the fact that the family is just a hidden Easter Egg in the actual game makes the trailer feel....exploitative. Like it was just using the imagery of a cute little girl getting chomped on by zombies in front of her helpless parents because they knew it would tug on heartstrings and create buzz. But they didn't have the balls to go outside the box and make the game any different from the dozens of monster/zombie/whatever shooters starring generic white male protagonists.
Anyhoo, the moral of this rambling write up is: Don't trust video game trailers! ESPECIALLY if it has no footage of the actual game.
Also, the people responsible for the trailer should be running the company.
no subject
Date: 2012-01-06 08:56 am (UTC)Dead children would make something banned in Europe? Really?
no subject
Date: 2012-01-06 09:58 am (UTC)This company managed to get people emotionally invested in their game -despite the fact that it was a new franchise by a podunk developer- with just a trailer. It would have been the most brilliant game marketing EVER if they had only followed through by keeping one of those parents alive for the game.
Dead children would make something banned in Europe? Really?
Well, I know for a fact that having dead kids on screen and/or giving the player the ability to shoot kids would cause the game to get an automatic "M" rating in our homeland. And I've heard that it's something that'll get a game banned in Europe and Australia because their governments are WAY more touchy about "excessive violence" in games than ours.
no subject
Date: 2012-01-06 04:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-06 08:53 pm (UTC)Australian censorship is a touchy subject, as they are far more conservative than even the European government is on things. They pretty much want to rate any M rated game with a sex scene as Adult's Only, even if it's a mostly censored sex scene.
OK, I understand the queasiness of shooting children, I do, but if they'd be undead, so not quite the same?
Fuck you lj I wasn't done.
no subject
Date: 2012-01-06 04:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-07 07:58 am (UTC)Your comment reminded me of something...
One of my favorite games (Silent Hill 1) centers around a widowed father frantically searching a zombie/monster infested town for his missing daughter. That game got adapted to the big screen a few years ago. But the film makers opted to change the main character into a woman because they didn't feel it was realistic for a dad to walk into hell to save a child that wasn't biologically his (the daughter is adopted). Needless to say, fans were PISSED!
no subject
Date: 2012-01-08 01:27 am (UTC)I think I would have preferred the game if it was, as you said, the mother on a roaring rampage of revenge. But god forbid we have a main female character in a american game with bashing (all I can say is thank god for Michonne in Walking dead. REPRESENT).
Generally, it's an okay game. Not even the best zombie rampager by far.
no subject
Date: 2012-01-08 04:06 am (UTC)Maybe they didn't make the mother the lead character because it's hard to take a character defined by this kind of horrible tragedy and sex her up Lara Croft-style for GQ ads. :P
no subject
Date: 2012-01-08 04:38 am (UTC)Also, no one is sexy during a zombie thing. IT'S ZOMBIE BAIT. all that skin. Jeez.
no subject
Date: 2012-01-08 04:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-08 04:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-09 07:58 am (UTC)Yeah, I'm a total wimp. ^_^;
...that reminds me. Silent Hill 3 had a really kickass (and fully clothed!) female lead.
no subject
Date: 2012-01-09 08:48 am (UTC)The game is only scary in that it causes fear in you the player, more than your character on screen. (Although all bets are off should your character lose all sanity.) And that's through lighting, music, and even the tilt of the screen. Seriously, if you ever get the chance, try it. I hate zombie/horror games, but Eternal Darkness was unique.
Here's the first part of the game, to give you an idea how it played: